Tip: This section should include your thesis sentence and will determine if you are for or against gay marriage.
Seed - Starting Sentence Option 1: Gay marriage is a [controversial/polarizing/contentious] topic that has been in the news [quite frequently/very often/a lot] lately. Gay marriage [is/is not] a threat to heterosexual marriages and I [feel/believe] that [state your belief here].
Seed - Starting Sentence Option 2: [Unfortunately/Fortunately], gay marriage is being legalized in some areas. While it’s a [controversial/difficult/questionable] decision, the ruling is one that some, including myself, are [happy/upset] about. Gay marriage is [state your belief].
- Banning gay marriage is discrimination and classification of human beings based on value.
- According to the 14th Amendment in the US Constitution, all people are to be considered equal, which would also apply to marriage.
- Traditionally, marriage is between a man and a woman and this should not be changed.
- Marriage is meant to be for procreation. As gay couples cannot physically reproduce, they have no reason to marry.
The Vatican’s Views on Homosexual Marriages
Marriage Equality Facts
Family Research Council
Same Sex Marriage Should be Legalized Essay example
2339 Words10 Pages
Every little girl dreams of her wedding day, and many can even be seen dressing up, putting pillow cases on their heads and pretending that they are actually walking down that long aisle towards the one they love. As these little girls grow up, some of them, as well as some little boys . who may not play dress up, but have equal aspirations of marriage when they grow up . will be faced with the harsh reality that this illustrious day may never come to pass for them. The reason is not that they will be unable to find someone with whom they want to spend their lives, but that whom they have chosen is unacceptable to society because they happen to be of the same sex. Evidence today shows that homosexuality is not a choice,…show more content…
For example, in 1968, when the law was passed, 72% of the population in the United
States disapproved of interracial marriage (Sullivan XXV). In fact, "hostility to same-sex marriage in 2004 is markedly less profound than hostility to interracial marriage was in
1968." Only about 60% of Americans are presently against legalizing same-sex unions, according to most polls (Sullivan XXVI). Hopefully, the U.S. government will realize that denying marriage to homosexuals is just as discriminatory as denying marriage to interracial couples in the past.
In addition to the denial of civil rights, the illegality of same-sex marriage also denies a multitude of more tangible benefits to homosexual couples. According to Nancy
Wilson, vice-moderator of the Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community
Churches, there are at least 200 "legal rights" that heterosexual married couples receive, which are not given to homosexual couples (Clash Over Gay Marriage 1996 para 5). The estimate of the U.S. General Accounting office is more generous, stating that, "more than
1,000 special benefits are automatically provided to heterosexual married couples simply because they are married. One example is that same-sex partners do not get to share in the benefits that married couples receive through the ability to file jointly on their income