Republican Essays

Essays from prominent Republicans

If one believes what one reads in the newspapers and sees on TV, a branding effort is currently underway to rebuild the Republican Party’s image leading up to the November general elections.

The effort is being led by House Minority Leader John Boehner in Washington, and Georgia Governor Sonny Perdue in the states.  There is no indication that the two are coordinating their actions.  In fact, by some accounts, there may be some disagreement over the direction of the effort and where it may end up.  One thing is certain, however – this kind of rehabilitation project is needed.  Some would say it is also long overdue.

In light of this effort, the Forum thought it would be helpful to ask a question that is critical the GOP brand.  The question is “Why am I a Republican?”  On its surface, the question seems simple enough.  But underneath, we believe this question gets to the heart of not only how Republicans define their party, but how the party, ultimately, defines itself.

We asked six prominent Republicans to write short essays explaining why they joined the GOP, what they believe the party stands for today, and the issues they believe the party should promote to achieve electoral success in the coming year.  Four of our writers serve at different levels of government.  Two are known for their work and achievements in their respective fields.

All of them, we believe, represent viewpoints that will be critical to the effort to repair the GOP’s image and ensure its success in the elections in 2008.


Orrin Hatch
United States Senator
Salt Lake City, Utah

I haven’t always been a Republican. I was raised in a Democrat, union family. Growing up, my family was poor, and I bought into the need for many of the so-called government give-away programs. I learned a skilled trade and became a union card-carrying journeyman metal lather.

But as I went to college, on a Mormon mission, and to law school, I recognized government was not the answer to every problem. I learned that personal responsibility and a government closer to the people was supremely better for businesses and individuals than an intrusive federal government that led to personal dependency through liberal programs. The grand power of the United States hinges on a competitive, free market economy in order to protect life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Compassionate conservatism works in the best interests for those struggling in America. The more we become dependent on the federal government, the more we frustrate our individual liberties. Instead of the Democrat-style of compassion shown through government handouts we must create an environment that inspires communities and individuals to take advantage of opportunities to improve their condition. Individuals have the power to change, and government can help them lead better lives.

I recognized government was not the answer to every problem.

I have found that conservative Republican policies lead to greater liberties, freedom, and prosperity – policies like lower taxes, less bureaucracy, stronger national security, greater enforcement of criminal law, vigilance against terrorism, and free market competition in health care and other compassionate programs.

Republicans are also best suited to maintain the balance of power between the three branches of government: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. Conservative Presidents and Governors nominate, and conservative Senators confirm, good, honest judges who interpret the laws and who do not act like super-legislators from the bench.

The Republican Party is the only party that stands for these true principles. In every way I am glad that I made the switch as a young man to become a conservative Republican.


Jo Ann Emerson
United States Representative
Cape Girardeau, Missouri

Republicans come from many backgrounds, but we are united by our desires for responsible leadership, principled but limited government, a belief in free markets, and respect for the rights of the individual.

These commonalities create a Republican philosophy which can be applied to solve any policy problem, or to argue that any problem should be exempted from a governmental solution. No matter our reasons for becoming Republicans, we are charged with expanding a common sense view of public policy to ensure the future health of our nation, as well as our party.

Today, the Republican imperative is to be problem-solvers in a nation where the short-term solution often comes at the expense of personal or constitutional freedoms, in the form of higher taxes, and with a necessary prescription for bigger government.  Taking the long view is never so easy, but it does pay dividends (especially in terms of our national security and economy) to Americans intent on getting to the heart of big problems.

No matter our reasons for becoming Republicans, we are charged with expanding a common sense view of public policy…

Immigration is certainly a case in point.  Proposals of amnesty would certainly reduce the number of illegal aliens in America on paper for the short-term.  But providing a tremendous incentive for future illegal immigration is sure to create more problems than can be solved with citizenship for lawbreakers.  Health care is another example.  A heavily-regulated market economy is not today meeting the goals of Americans who eschew insurance and preventative care at the risk of relying on emergency room medicine and Medicaid.

The conservative approach to immigration hinges on capable enforcement of U.S. laws and assessments of the need for specialized workers’ visas.  Health care and entitlement spending, on the other hand, require us to balance fiscal concerns with moral ones in a far more complicated analysis.  But access to affordable health care, unlike free passage to America for illegal immigrants, has become a valued and important right to the American people in this day and age.

To succeed in national politics today, Republicans must return to the foundation of our philosophy: sound tax policy and balanced budgets, a strong national defense, robust diplomacy and a focus on the ever-evolving rights of individuals.

The new twist is that we must earnestly apply these principles to new policy problems for the 21st Century, problems like health care, energy independence, and even the environment.


Chuck Norris
Actor, author, and businessman
Tarzana, California

There are several reasons why I am Republican.

First and foremost, I believe it is people — not government — that are granted power by God to make a difference in the world.  And as such we should seek in society to maximize the role of people and minimize the role of government.  As the Declaration of Independence declares, “governments are instituted among men, deriving their just power from the consent of the governed.”  Or as our Constitution begins, “We the people of the United States…”

Second, I believe free enterprise and a free market create the basis for the expansion of capitalism, which produces jobs, goods, competition, income, etc.  Government should promote not restrict or control these economic freedoms, as the Republican platform espouses. We should encourage financial independence from, not financial dependency upon, governmental aid.

Third, I believe in defending our freedoms and property, personally and nationally.  Thomas Jefferson put it well, “For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security.”  From the Second Amendment to our military forces, Republicanism seeks to defend what we establish and possess.

I believe free enterprise and a free market create the basis for the expansion of Capitalism…

Fourth, I believe in protecting the right to life. Again, the Declaration of Independence states, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”  I believe those rights extend to the unborn, represented in the traditional pro-life stand of the Republican Party.

In addition to these four reasons, I also believe the Republican party puts better emphasis and more resources into fighting crime and illegal drugs, encouraging educational reform and options, providing energy independence, restricting illegal immigration, assuring health care, limiting taxes, and esteeming traditional marriage and family values.

In short, what I believe and value has led me to register and remain Republican.

That is a part of why I choose to be a Republican.


Lynn Swann
Businessman, Hall of Fame wide receiver
Sewickley, Pennsylvania 

Why am I a Republican?

The “why” part of this question is something we should ask ourselves about everything we do, think, and believe.

Being a Republican is something that comes easy to me, because the Republican Party represents the values and ideals I identify with.  Because of these values, I am free to choose to be a Republican.  So who am I that the Republican Party fits me better than the alternatives?

I am a Christian who believes in the right to say “Under God” in our Pledge of Allegiance or have a prayer in school, but my party respects the right to not have to say that prayer or to face East at the appropriate time to pray to Allah if that is your belief.  My party is committed to helping the poor, while at the same time encouraging all Americans to do more without punishing them with higher taxes and excessive regulations.

Our government should provide a framework and a safety net for how we live in a free society and provide protection for the people that live here. As a nation, we should protect and strengthen our Constitution.  The foundation, for our nation to advance, is education, integrity and selflessness.  These are a part of my core beliefs, and the Republican Party fits my position better than the other political parties.

I do not take the positions that my party is perfect or without fault in its history or platforms.

As a Black American, the history of support from the beginning of the Republican Party — from Abraham Lincoln and Fredrick Douglas — has been without political peer. From slavery to civil rights to the most important political appointments, the deeds of the Republican Party outweigh the rhetoric of the Democrats.

I do not take the position that my party is perfect or without fault in its history or platforms.  What is most important is the party listens and evolves to continue to represent the needs and thinking of the people of the United States of America.

With that in mind, my voice within the Republican Party can be heard and be an agent for productive change.

That is a part of why I choose to be a Republican.


Heidi Gansert
Minority Leader,
Nevada State Assembly
Reno, Nevada 

When the question was posed “Why I became a Republican,” I can tell you that I never considered being anything but a Republican.

When I first checked the box to register to vote, there was no hesitation.  My innate nature is one of self-reliance and personal responsibility which, in my opinion, are fundamental to a Republican.

When I analyze how I evolved to where I am in a political sense, my desires to help my community, participate in discussions involving what is suitable for my state, and how Nevada can be the greatest place to live, are the reasons I ran for office.  What overlies these desires is a recognition that self-reliance, a sound education, and plain hard work can get you anywhere in our great country.

Freedom can only exist in states and nations where self-reliance and responsibility are taken on by individuals.

As a relative newcomer to politics, I have never viewed myself as a “politician” as that conjures up negative connotations for many.  I am a community member who has chosen a high level of civic involvement. I am a Republican because I believe all individuals can accomplish great things.  I am also a Republican because I support the freedom provided by our country.

Freedom can only exist in states and nations where self-reliance and responsibility are taken on by individuals.  I am thankful everyday that I live in this country where nothing is impossible and everything is possible.


Frank Guinta
Mayor of Manchester,
New Hampshire 

To answer the question, “why I am a Republican,” I go back to Ronald Reagan and the incredible legacy he left for America.

I am 37 years old, so my formative years were during Reagan’s time in office. It was his influence that helped develop my political beliefs and my approach toward public service.

He was someone that had that rare ability to talk tough to the most powerful figures of his era while being able to communicate to the common person.  He understood that government helped people the most when it let them be entrepreneurs and pioneers, not wards of the state.  He knew that challenging – not appeasing – tyrants benefited America and the rest of the free world.  But most importantly, Reagan loved America and what it stood for: rugged individualism, a commitment to freedom here and abroad, and limited government.

To answer the questions, “Why I am a Republican,” I go back to Ronald Reagan and the incredible legacy he left for America.

In my role as Mayor of Manchester, I have developed a similar governing style.  In my first term, my top priority was to provide residents with tax relief and responsible budgets while enhancing public safety, lowering crime in the city and improving the city’s educational system. Because the city’s 14-member Board of Aldermen consists of 11 Democrats, I often have to work with them to forge important policy initiatives.  However, I always kept my principles intact and was still able to pass most of my agenda in my first term.

As I embark on a second term, I will continue to highlight the issues that we Republicans support: fiscal responsibility; the right to live safe from crime; an education system that doesn’t fail our children and limited government that rewards, not punishes, entrepreneurship.

This is the path I have forged and one I plan to stay true to in the coming years.   RF

political views of federalists and republicans

  • Length: 357 words (1 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - More ↓
The political views of the federalist and the republicans towards the government of the United States of America were different. The republicans stressed equality of rights among citizens allowing people to govern themselves. The federalists believed in a stronger government one in which was sovereign and had superior power over the local governments.
     The republicans view almost always proved to be a disaster but the republicans believed that if a republican government could succeed anywhere, it would be within the virtuous communities of the United States of America. The republicans felt that replacing a monarchy government with a republican government would give the people many more rights and freedoms. Many people thought that it required too much public integrity for the people to govern themselves and live independently. It would require the people to obey laws and maintain order with the absence of monarchy forces.
     The federalists view saw the republicans view as a weakness. They insisted on a stronger common government. The federalists had an understanding that there could only be one sovereign in a political system, one final authority that everyone must obey and no one can appeal. They thought this was the only effective way in creating an effective central government. The independent states seemed to think it was clear that each one of them were independently sovereign, although based on history only small countries were suitable for the republican government. With history proving the republicans wrong for trying to create a republican government in the states the federalists were slowly trying to create a stronger central government. There first step was making the sovereign states agree to the Articles of Confederation which established a close alliance of independent states. The federalist central government was referred to as a “confederacy”.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"political views of federalists and republicans." 10 Mar 2018

LengthColor Rating 
Political Parties in George Washington's Cabinet Essay - A political party is a group of people who seek to win elections and hold public office in order to shape government policy and programs. George Washington warned the nation against creating political parties in his famous “Farewell Address”. He feared political parties would divide the country and weaken support of the Constitution (Doc 4). The first major political parties, the Federalists and the Republicans, were created during the term of President George Washington. Despite President Washington’s warning, the rise of the two political parties, in the years after his term was inevitable....   [tags: Federalists, democrats, republicans]751 words
(2.1 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Jeffersonian Republicans Vs. Federalists Essay - As the young colonies of America broke away from their mother country and began to grow and develop into an effective democratic nation, many changes occurred. As the democracy began to grow, two main political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. Each party had different views on how the government should be run. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in strong state governments, a weak central government, and a strict construction of the Constitution. The Federalists opted for a powerful central government with weaker state governments, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution....   [tags: essays research papers]1170 words
(3.3 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Federalists Essays - The early years of the Constitution of the United States were full of political strife. The two prominent political ideals were complete opposites. The Jeffersonian Republicans were focused on giving power to the people and maintaining a pastoral economy, while the Federalists supported the control of the government by the elite class, and maintaining “positive” democracy. Both parties feared the influence and effect the other party would have on the public. In Linda K. Kerber's article, “The Fears of the Federalists”, the major concerns Federalists held in the early 19th century are described....   [tags: U.S. Politics ]
:: 2 Works Cited
1009 words
(2.9 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Debate over Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 Essay - Two popular parties in America during the formation of a new nation debated for decades over different laws, policies and other various government issues. These two parties were know as the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans also known as the Jeffersonian Republicans. Popular names in the Federalist party included John Adams, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay while James Madison and Thomas Jefferson were the most know Democratic-Republicans. Perhaps the largest debate was over the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798....   [tags: federalists, republican, debate, government]650 words
(1.9 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Jeffersonian-Republicans Essay - The Jeffersonian-Republicans (also known as the Democratic-Republicans) were opposed to the Federalists from before 1801-1817. Leaders Thomas Jefferson and James Madison created the party in order to oppose the economic and foreign policies of Alexander Hamilton and the Federalist Party. The Democratic-Republicans supported the French, whereas the Federalists supported the British. Each party had its set of views. The Federalists supported a loose interpretation of the Constitution, a strong central government, high tariffs, a navy, military spending, a national debt, and a national bank (all ideas of the Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton)....   [tags: Political Science]1136 words
(3.2 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
The Court Case of Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review Essays - ... Here is the contradiction to popular belief. Marshall was not a pioneer for the creation of fair and equal government, he was really trying to make a decision that would protect his position while pleasing both the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. This is most accurately described by Robert G. McCloskey: “ a mastery of indirection [is]…Marshall’s ability to sidestep danger while seeming to court it, to advance in one direction while his opponents are looking another”(Clinton 6). Marshall’s actions were fueled by political concerns, not legal....   [tags: supreme courts, federalists, justice]
:: 1 Works Cited
866 words
(2.5 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
The Rise of Political Parties Essay - ... This statement expresses Hamilton's distrust with Madison and Jefferson, who happened to be on the political party opposite to that of Hamilton's. In statement 4, George Washington also warns against the distrust brought about by forming political parties. He states that political parties bring about jealousy and hatred for one another, which is a defining factor for the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties. In addition to general distrust, policy disagreements had also led to the rise of political parties....   [tags: disagreements, distrust, policy]535 words
(1.5 pages)
Good Essays[preview]
Political Party System: The Federalists vs. the Republicans Essay - Before the Declaration of Independence in 1776, colonies were separate from each other; there was very little interaction. As Britain exerted their power on the colonies, imposing unreasonable taxes without colonial consent, people realized their freedom was threatened. Colonists felt the need to unite and act together to call for independence. When the country finally claimed its independence, Americans started to drift apart once again due to the differences in their viewpoints. Political parties came into existence....   [tags: washington, adams, independence]
:: 1 Works Cited
1439 words
(4.1 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
The Roles and Future of Political Parties in America Essay - When George Washington left office, he warned the nation about political parties fearing they were dangerous to the way government should function. Despite his warning, political parties developed and changed American politics forever. By definition, a political party is "a group of office holders, candidates, activists, and voters who identify with a group label and seek to elect to public office individuals who run under that label" (O'Connor and Sabato 437). The creation of political parties can be traced back to the differing views of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton while they served in Washington's cabinet....   [tags: American History]549 words
(1.6 pages)
Good Essays[preview]
A Comparison of the Federalists and the Republicans Essay - A Comparison of the Federalists and the Republicans Federalism a central feature of the American political system has long been an important issue. The nature of federalism has been shaped through the years by debates between prominent statesmen, laws, and Supreme Court decisions. When the colonies declared their independence from the Britain in 1776, they reacted against the British unitary system in which all political and economic power was concentrated in London. A major source of friction between the colonies and the mother country was the British attempt to reclaim powers previously granted to the colonial governments....   [tags: Papers]346 words
(1 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]

Related Searches

Political Views         Republicans         Federalists         Central Government         Effective Way         Obey         Articles Of Confederation         Political System         Stronger        

The last phrase of the articles represented the states acting together instead of a government directly responsible to the people.
     Eventually the republicans and federalists were able to create a government with a type of republic form but that did not depend on the integrity or virtue of the public. In the new federal system neither the states nor the national government were sovereign.

Categories: 1

0 Replies to “Republican Essays”

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *